@OP
The judgment your making between Atari and NES is that we consider NEs games leap years ahead of Atari games by the wrong values. You are judging the games based on graphics rather than gameplay. Playing these Atari, Intellivision, Coleco, Gemini games I personaly know that the game play offered between the generation is vastly different.
Pre crash games were limited to a handful of levels 3-5 that generally just repeated and became harder by becoming faster. We didn't have epic stories in rpgs. We didn't have simple physics to support skate boarding games like Skate or Die. Or large number of levels in mario games.
The truth of the matter is that from NES to PS2 we haven't really seen much difference in game play. For the most part it's bean a linear graphical upgrade and limiting the scope of gaming genre rather than increasing the games we play.
The Wii software in question is expanding the gaming by offering "games" that are more like entertainment software that are less games and more experience.
So your posting is wrong and your direction of judgment is wrong.
Squilliam: On Vgcharts its a commonly accepted practice to twist the bounds of plausibility in order to support your argument or agenda so I think its pretty cool that this gives me the precedent to say whatever I damn well please.
