IGN Review: Resident Evil 5 - 9.0

[ZenfoldorVGI]

hayeya_k said:
a good score for a normal game,,
disappointing for a numbered Resident evil game

isnt this the worst numbered resident evil game for ign ?? damn you capcom and your COOP

 

You're completely ignorant.

You can't compare games that are years apart, via numerical score, even from the same website. It's bullshit, and if you thought more about your posts you would realize it.

Since most of you are still unable to take me at my word, I will do you another favor(besides stating the obvious and feeding you excellent flames that you share with your friends and take credit for) and prove it with real life examples that I'm sure will hit close to home with your fanboy natures.

Resistance 2

PlayStation 3 Game by Sony Computer Entertainment     IGN Score: 9.5

2-3 months later:

 

Killzone 2

PlayStation 3 Game by Sony Computer Entertainment     IGN Score: 9.4

Now, another ignorant assumption you've made is that 9/10 is a poor score for a Resident Evil game. A 9/10 is never a poor score. You should take my word on that.

What would be a "good score" for you? A 9.1? A 9.2? 9.3 and up? What exactly is the part of the game that makes the miniscule(1 in 100, btw) difference, and causes the game to move from a 9.1 to a 9.2? You probably didn't even read the review, and since basing everyting strictly off a numerical score is widely known to be ignorant in the first place, then yes, once again you have proven yourself.

Another thing is your presumption that this was the lowest numerically scored RE(numbered) game from IGN(as if it mattered, which I've proved it doesn't). Again, incorrect and misleading.

How can one discredit themselves so much with one very small paragraph? I didn't know it was possible until you posted.