disolitude said:
outlawauron said:
disolitude said:
They seem to be comparing the worng games.
Anyone that thinks Halo 3 and COD and Killzone 2 offer same experiences are idiots. Statements like these are hillarious.
"I'm confident that gamers will be sucked into Killzone 2's Call of Duty-caliber multiplayer experience."
and
"Its (halo 3) replay value is high too-even though the game is somewhat dated and not as sexy as say Call of Duty: World at War/Call of Duty 4."
Halo 3 is nothing like COD and is leagues beyond it in what it does. They should have compared COD and Killzone 2.
In any case, a game that is out for over a year and a half is getting compared to a brand new game that is the biggest, most hyped and one of the most expensive releases this year in a biased publication and the new game is barely winning. Shows how amazing Halo 3 really is... |
Your right about Halo not being in the same league as Call of Duty.
I'd say that Call of Duty is about 15 leagues ahead.
|
Ahead of what? You're just trolling now...
Look, we understand that you don't get Halo and why its fun. Tis a shame.
I understand why COD is great and the reason why someone would like COD MP is not the same reason one loves to plays Halo 3 MP and vice versa. Simple as that.
|
I'm sorry, but my experiences playing Halo 3 online just weren't much fun. I absolutely loved Halo and Halo 2's mutliplayer. And the only real difference between the two's multiplayer is that in Call of Duty, you can't absorb bullets as well as you can in Halo.
