| mrstickball said: I think the 'less diverse' argument for the 360 is laughable at best. Racing:
Shooter:
Family:
Action:
Sports:
RPG:
The argument that the PS3 user base is more diverse is beyond hilarious. Why is it that 90% of all multi-plat games sell better on the 360? To me, that doesn't mean that the PS3 is more diverse: it tells me the 360 beats the PS3 pretty badly when it comes to diversity. When the PS3 has a very low 5.5-6.0) attach ratio vs. the 360 (8.0+), it also shows me further the PS3 userbase lacks diversity, since they aren't buying many games to diversify their library, either. The rare instances the PS3 actually wins are usually skewed with heavy Japanese sales such as a DMC4, PES, and such. But again, that's 10% of titles, which isn't diversity. The simple reason the PS3 gets it's rear end handed to it in SW sales:
Those are the 2 best reasons I've found so far. I'd really like a major rebuttal that shows what genre the PS3 flourishes in that the 360 does not. If there's ever an issue, it's always regional (a game selling more in a specific area or culture) rather than an actual full genre across more than 1-2 games. |
It's very simple why multi-plat games sell better on the 360 than the PS3 : The huge userbase advantage in NA. That's it.
Next Gen
| 11/20/09 04:25 | makingmusic476 | Warning | Other (Your avatar is borderline NSFW. Please keep it for as long as possible.) |







