Zkuq on 28 February 2009
| Squilliam said: Microsofts service is paid, therefore they have more incentive to develop a strong architecture whilst Sony just has a massive expense, they rely on servers for 32+ player matches and they are trying to cut costs - hence less investment in infrastructure. |
Doesn't MS use mostly P2P based servers, ie. they don't host them themselves but the players do? Of course it's a little more secure, but otherwise it's definitely worse than dedicated servers. That is, if the whole P2P thing is true; at least I've been hearing about it every now and then.
