dbot on 26 February 2009
| Wyku said: Okay, so it's about what other big name FPS' are at for length, but does that make it any better? Is the FPS single player campaign even important anymore? From reports I've read on the latest COD games a lot of people don't even bother playing the single player campaign, let alone finish it. Would you still pay top tier price for the next KZ/Gears/Halo/COD if it were strictly multiplayer? |
I think the single player is very important, but not necessarily the length. In my opinion, Call of Duty 4 is the best single player I've played. Also, it was the shortest at about 5 and a half hours. Sometimes FPS's just seem to drag out the levels to increase the time it takes to complete. They will add endless cave/tunnel sequences that really become a bit repetitive.
Thanks for the input, Jeff.
