Fire Emblem: Radiant Dawn discussion thread: stats, characters etc.

[Oyvoyvoyv]

RolStoppable said:

Oyvoyvoyv said:

RolStoppable said:

PoR has 30 maps, RD has 43 maps which makes it a 40-50 % longer game. (The percentage given isn't refering to number of maps but to hours of gameplay, although it doesn't make much difference.)

 That means I've played almost 200 RD maps.... Crap...

How the heck did you make it in 228 turns? Was it on easy, so you rushed with some, and trained the rest?

This is the best strategy game of all time. And no, that's not an opinion - it's a fact.

Also, the percentage is given to the amount of maps...

40% longer would be 42 maps, 50% longer would be 45 maps.

So, by your claim, the maps average between 2% shorter and 5% longer in RD (vs PoR). Are you seriously saying they're exactly as long as each others (the maps)? I really doubt that.

Why is there always so much room between your paragraphs, or in this case, sentences?

Obviously I did it on easy and I used the characters with the biggest range to complete the objective as fast as possible (like part 2 final in two turns). Part 2 prologue and part 3 chapter 7 were really annoying, because they didn't end before "survive for x turns". Overall there were only two maps on which I needed ten turns or more.

Radiant Dawn is in fact the best strategy game of all time.

Regarding the percentage: You know, it's not normal that levels in two different games are about equally long, that's why I said it's refering to hours of gameplay (personally I needed 30 hours for PoR and 43 hours for RD on the first playthrough) instead of number of maps. The maps take on average about equally long to complete in these two FE games, although my PoR time is probably a little inflated because it was my first Fire Emblem game.

 

Because I suck at paragraphing. The alternative would be

 

 That means I've played almost 200 RD maps.... Crap... How the heck did you make it in 228 turns? Was it on easy, so you rushed with some, and trained the rest? This is the best strategy game of all time. And no, that's not an opinion - it's a fact.

Also, the percentage is given to the amount of maps... 40% longer would be 42 maps, 50% longer would be 45 maps. So, by your claim, the maps average between 2% shorter and 5% longer in RD (vs PoR). Are you seriously saying they're exactly as long as each others (the maps)? I really doubt that.

 

Which, honestly, looks far less attractive to read.