Fire Emblem: Radiant Dawn discussion thread: stats, characters etc.

[Oyvoyvoyv]

RolStoppable said:

im_sneaky said:

shakarak said:

I actually found RD much better then POR.  The game was easily 2-3 times as long as POR WAS (because of the disk format change?).  Even the story in Radian dawn I enjoyed more which is weird.  I also had 3 people killed off in my first run through on RD compared to 1 on POR.

THe reason I chose to rebump this thread is because people on this site always bitch about not searching the forums to see if a topic was already made.  So I searched the forums and came up with this.

 

@Famous

Yeah I liked Bastian because of his versatility in magic spells.  I never had alot of money for arms scrolls so I was excited he came preloaded with A's and an S in his weapon grades.

It isn't 2-3 times as long. PoR is 27 is, i think, 28 or 29 chapters. This one is 38.

PoR has 30 maps, RD has 43 maps which makes it a 40-50 % longer game. (The percentage given isn't refering to number of maps but to hours of gameplay, although it doesn't make much difference.)

 

 That means I've played almost 200 RD maps.... Crap...

 

How the heck did you make it in 228 turns? Was it on easy, so you rushed with some, and trained the rest?

 

This is the best strategy game of all time. And no, that's not an opinion - it's a fact.

 

Also, the percentage is given to the amount of maps...

 

40% longer would be 42 maps, 50% longer would be 45 maps.

 

So, by your claim, the maps average between 2% shorter and 5% longer in RD (vs PoR). Are you seriously saying they're exactly as long as each others (the maps)? I really doubt that.