By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
JaggedSac said:
vlad321 said:
Barozi said:
vlad321 said:
There's a difference between "Better than I thuoght it would be" and being "actually good and awesome." From the demo, this RTS is ridiculously simplistic when compared to other RTSes and that's a fact. I don't know about 6.5 but it did not deserve even an 8 imo.

Yeah because every game must be complex or else it's bad.....

 

Because it's too simple to be enjoyable. Too many intricacies missing, too little strategy. In fact I'm happy it's getting these scores, that way we won't see a flood of shitty RTS cames on consoles which people claim are god, the way we are seeing with FPSes.

 

Oh, you've played the final game?

 

Comparing it to the other RTS demos, mostly DoW, WC3, etc., it's very lacking. WC3 got a 90 from Gamestop, this game doesn't even come up to the ankles of what WC3 is and you expect a higher score?



Tag(thx fkusumot) - "Yet again I completely fail to see your point..."

HD vs Wii, PC vs HD: http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=93374

Why Regenerating Health is a crap game mechanic: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3986420

gamrReview's broken review scores: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4170835