I don't need a review. I didn't ask for a review. I asked: Did you like it, do you normally like these kind of games, what were you expecting from this game, and how long did you play it? That's not a review. That's a survey.
And no, I don't think it's coincidence that the numbers are similar because they sort of aren't. Even excepting Play Magazine* they range, as a genreal trend, from 4-7 (and average out to 57% nonetheless). No, that's not a good number, even if you think of 5 as average (when many think that 7 is, for some idiotic reason), but it's still within the "Most people won't like it, but plenty of people will be satisfied" range. And even still, it doesn't actually mean anything when the numbers are as made up as in an episode of "Whose Line is it Anyway?" Even when I try to give the most fair opinion I can of soemthing on a 1-10 scale I'm still just pulling the number out of my ass. And so are the reviewers/editors.
So, again, I want opinions from people who have actually played it and their expectations. You played it and disliked it. Do you like this sort of game normally? If issues were fixed would you have enjoyed it more? And how long did you actually play?
All you give is an opinion without telling us the background for the experience. If you walked into a Gamestop, played it for 30 seconds, and decided you hated it before you even picked up the controller then your opinion is tainted. So, tell me, what conditions did you play this under?
*Note: Let's be honest here. PM is as useless to me as GameSpy. Neither opinion means jack to me. I want the people of vgcharts to speak up and indicate that the dislike towards this game comes from more than a dislike for the genre, the company, the system or what have you.
You do not have the right to never be offended.
