Proof that "metacritic" is a farce if you go off aggregated scores

[Skeeuk]

hello.

its been flying around for a while now.

game A is 92 hence it is AAA

and game B is 88 and is not AAA

i call BS on the way metacritic works and is completly unfair to use it as a judgment on whats the better game or what isnt.

in my view an AAA game is..........#1 a game thats recived well by reviews, #2 has acclaimed sales, and more importantly is enjoyed by the gamers who have purchased the game.

the bolded is far more important to what makes an AAA title out of the 3 catagories ive listed as its the only catagory that you can actually play.

ive just come across this below. on PC metacritic 

 

Out of the Park Baseball 2007

96

and...........................

Left 4 Dead

89

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

now going of scores one would say out of the park baseball is a better game than L4D simply because metacritic says so as its something you would call AAA, or is it?

are you a gamer who agrees with flawed aggregated scores, or do you just enjoy games for what they bring to you personally as a gamer?