Entroper on 11 September 2007
| super_etecoon said: I don't think anyone questions the banning of Leo-J. There is one thread that is banworthy in and of itself regarding Warhawk reviews. All in all I think the site could use more bannings, but I think that only precipitates new accounts and speculations as to which new user the banned party is. I'm not sure if there needs to be a sanctioned public display as to why someone was banned. Most of us either see it coming, or can check post history to see what mistake the user made. I have never seen anyone get banned here that didn't deserve it and i don't think the mods should be required to explain their rationale using specific posts or threads. |
I don't think they should have to explain themselves either, but the mods are constantly under attack for being "biased". I think explanations would be helpful in curbing this notion.
