Tom Chick frags Killzone 2 (says it isn't worth playing)

[forevercloud3000]

drpunk said:

richardhutnik said:

I am going to comment here in closing, by saying, if Tom Chick has NO credibility, I am curious who does.  One can say he may not have a lot of credibility, but none?  Is one supposed to look to the likes of the former Crazzyman as a source of truth?

It's not that difficult.

If person agrees with my opinion they are credible. If they disagree with my opinion they are not credible.

That seems to be how it works.

 

it more like this....

If you firmly believe A to be true

Someone else believes B to be true

You two obviously disagree

But in a different instance you both can come to some kind of an agreement then all is well.

A Reviewer,writer, journalist looses credibility when their opinion is CONSTANTLY at odds with their general fanbase. Why should I listen to the opinions of someone who I never agree with? Thats stupid.