| davygee said: What I'm trying to say is that the PS3 should be classed as a console apart from the the 360 and Wii and a generation ahead. Yes the Wii would have been out for 1 year, but the 360 would have been out for 2 years and the PS3 could have tapped into that. You need to deliver a new machine either on time or skip it to a reasonably later date. The PS3 should have been released early last year to make the difference...but because it comes out and has to compete with Nintendo's Wii which is less than half the price....this is what Nintendo do...look at the DS against the PSP...half price again....then build up the base with a solid bunch of games, but nothing spectacular...and people will buy into it...the more people who buy it makes more people want it. If Sony couldn't release the PS3 worldwide in March 2006...then they should have delayed it unti; at least November 2007 or even later. |
It wouldn't work the titles PS3 launched with wasn't that much more beutiful than xbox360. If the should wait untill 2007 the HD-DVD thing to xbox360 actuly could have been selling at least 500k or something giving HD-DVD an edge, making the format was extra hard.
It wasn't Wii:s price that killed the momentum for PS3, it was it own price that killed it 600 USD. More Wii isn't selling on price alone it is selling on a new experience.
Buy it and pray to the gods of Sigs: Naznatips!
