Killzone 2 VS Gears of War 2 through the eyes of a programmer

[Final-Fan]

jetrii said:

Final-Fan said:

jetrii said:

mjk45 said:
@jetrii,how much of the r&d is funded by IBM and how much by Toshiba and Sony and didn't i just read somewhere about Toshiba recently start putting them into there products and a cell super comp coming on line and 20m ps3 is a lot of chips so it seems to be picking up even if its slower than they like but i get your point about the market having to widen ,especially with programmable GPU's ready to take off even if it means a complete mobo overall

IBM did most of the development but Sony and Toshiba contributed a lot in funds. Also, keep in mind that the Cell processors being used in supercomputers are not the ones inside of the Playstation 3. The Playstation 3 Cell processor is fairly weak and outdated compared to the one IBM uses. IBM uses the PowerXCell 8i which had its SPEs remade with improved memory addressing and dual-precesion improvements.

Even so people have been doing some amazing shit with PS3 clusters! I've seen any number of news items on so-and-so doing this or that with 'em.

That's because the Cell processor in the PS3 is still pretty powerful and much cheaper than an IBM Cell server. Sony should actually be worried about that, although it gives them good press, it makes them lose money and lowers their tiein ratio.

See, that sounds opposite from what you said before, even though both statements are consistent.  Although how outdated can it be, if the clusters are so effective? 

Agreed on the tie-in ratio though, which makes what the PS3 actually has more impressive. 
Also agreed on the clusters being a loss for Sony.  But someday -- some glorious day! -- it'll sell for a profit; and in the meantime it is awesome PR.