By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Sharky54 on 09 February 2009
Edit Thread
Viper1 said:
Sharky54 said:
Procrastinato said:
scottie said:
BeTa77 said:
Bethesda just doesn't like the Wii. but most of there games are way to BIG for the Wii to handle.

 

I agree, the Wii's 9.4 gb of disc space is less than the 8 gb available on a 360 disc

I learn a lot from the Wii knowers.  Who knew X360 was so crippled?  Thanks for the infos scottie.

 

I think they are both 9 GBs

 

Anyway, its not the amount of info, its the size of the gameworld. If you have played fallout3 you know that you can see certain buildings from the other side of the map(this is the size of a city). The Wii cannot handle that at high graphical settigs.

 

Have you played Spider-Man: Web of Shadows on Wii?  You can stand on a building on the northern side of Central park and see every building all the way to the southern tip of Manhattan.   7.5 miles.

Sure the building details (LOD) is very low that far away but you also have a few thousand buildings in between to render along with traffic, pedestrians and enemies.

All that on a mid budget Treyarch game.  I'm quite sure Bethesda can work wonders with.

 

Bethesda likes a lot more on screen with a lot of detail. Also 7.5 miles isnt that far. Fallout you can see much farther then that. I am not even joking, from one side of the map you can see tenpenny tower. The map is HUGE.

 

The game world itself is similar in size to that of Oblivion, which has a 16-square-mile (41 km2) game world. 16 miles of 720p goodness compared to 7 miles of low res ugly. There really is no contest.