The_vagabond7 said:
Alright, hold that thought...
"Fear 2? Surely you're joking right. I play Fear 2 and I feel like it's an N64 game. The textures are absolutely atrocious. The gameplay is bland and boring. Honestly, you must not be a big shooter fan if you honestly enjoyed Fear 2's demo more than KZ2. I just don't see how anyone could remotely have that opinion." "Opinions are so stupid. We should just agree with you instead."
"I just think it's a horrible opinion. When a big reasoning for your discontent with a game is "Kill Zone's graphics are 'okay'" and Fear 2 leaves you with a good impression? Please. Any objective person clearly would say Kill Zone 2 blows Fear 2's graphics out of the water. "
Yep, no over exagerated fanboy rage here... (keep in mind, the guy he was talking to never said Fear 2 had better graphics, merely that he like the demo better). Carry on. |
Speaking of fanboy rage. Is that you in several posts crying about Kill Zone 2 being involved in them? Ah yes. Spare me your BS.
I don't care if he doesn't like Kill Zone 2. That is his opinion. I just think it's a horrible one to have. No opinion is wrong or right, although you can have certainly an odd opinion. For example, I could say Haze is just a better game graphically and fun wise compared to Gears of War 2. Certainly most people would disagree with me and it would be a very unpopular opinion to hold.
The point about the graphics is simple. If you think Kill Zone 2 has "Okay" Graphics. Define what you believe has "Good" Graphics on a console. I'm very interested. And if Graphics are a criteria for Kill Zone 2 and his enjoyment of it, shouldn't they be for Fear 2? (Which btw has horrendous graphics).
Carry on. I know you have some issue you're trying to prove. I'll be eagerly awaiting your next literary turd.







