Wow, I go off to a meeting and find so much hate and vitriol.
A few important points for those that seemed to only read the negative parts of my post and none of the positives.
A) I didn't compare it to Halo on the 360.
B) I said the graphics are top notch.
C) I stated that it has a lock on realism this gen from a physics perspective.
D) I said the graphics overall were about the same as the two current "top games" in the graphics category -- Gears 2 and MGS 4. Both are quite solid graphically and this most certainly shouldn't be interpreted as an insult. If I've compared it to MGS 4, Sony die-hards should be thrilled given how great everyone thinks it is... How is that negative?
E) I even added that it looks like a polished Call of Duty. Isn't that a compliment in saying that is is graphically better than one of the best shooters to have come out this generation? (I was specifically talking about the last two iterations, but I'm more familiar with COD4)
F) I stated "Demo AI" and "Based on the demo", and "I'm going to wait for the full game to come out and read more reviews". What part of me clearly talking about basing my impressions on the demo is hard to understand?
I hate trolls.
Systems I currently own: 360, PS3, Wii, DS Lite (2)
Systems I've owned: PS2, PS1, Dreamcast, Saturn, 3DO, Genesis, Gamecube, N64, SNES, NES, GBA, GB, C64, Amiga, Atari 2600 and 5200, Sega Game Gear, Vectrex, Intellivision, Pong. Yes, Pong.
