Reasonable said:
madskillz said:
windbane said:
Reasonable said:
windbane said:
madskillz said:
I played it - three times - and think it will be a good game. However, as enamored as folks are, I am not impressed. It's like most shooters I have played. The demo locked up twice for a few seconds. The visuals weren't that stunning. It seemed a bit out of focus - like a lense with crap and mudspots on it. Maybe it is the way it looks in war.
There are a few demos I have played and enjoyed the demo. Each demo really sells me or leaves me hanging. Unless Sony sends me a review copy or I find it for under $25, I won't be picking this up soon. |
consider me shocked.
|
It's his subtelty that I like. It's also fun to try and guess what his post would be if the title was a 360 title.
|
Hey, at least he's thorough by saying he played it 3 times. I'm sure Sony is in a hurry to send him a review copy...
|
Haha. You make me laugh. Being honest - and we've gotten most Sony games - LBP, a couple copies of SOCOM - so I'll get it. If it was a 360 title, it would have gotten the same treatment.
Just because someone has a different impression than you doesn't make it wrong.
Seriously, what is just so awesome about it? It's a good game - and if demos are supposed to influence a person - what did it do different that COD: WaW didn't do? The detail in the faces in WaW was leaps and bounds better than "KZ2."
I saw nothing earth-shattering about "KZ2" and the 360 - only mentioned by both of you - was nowhere in my impression.
EDIT: Tell you what - create a thread about "Kill Zone 2" and only allow positive reviews if you don't want folks voicing their opinions.
|
Yes, but there are balanced opinions and biased ones... and your posting history makes it quite clear to me where you sit.
I think KZ2 looks good but would agree I've seen nothing amazing about it either. It's the fact you consistently overpush the quality of 360 games vs underpushing PS3 titles that I'm referring to, therefore I don't actually believe your 'if it was 360 it would have gotten same treatment'... message.
|
You are entitled to your opinion. Yes, I have more games for the 360 than my PS3, but ... I still get games for the PS3 as well. What you fail to see is - I review games - not systems. Games. Where did I say the PS3 in the minireview? I only focus on games.
Sure, I enjoy my 360 but I like my PS3 too. If it's a good game, or a great game, it doesn't matter what system it's on.
Seriously, why should I just bash "Kill Zone 2?" I played LBP - and fell asleep on it. Granted, I saw some cool things in "Too Human," but overall, it was a turd.
As I have stated before - contrary to popular belief, I am not a 360 fanboy. And I have the bar set the same for GAMES.
I am not going to hype/tout something just because it's on said console - in this case, the 360. I see "Kill Zone 2" as a good shooter, just not great.
You can say I am pro-360, or in bed with Microsoft and hate Sony, and I really could care less. I review games - and if the game is not great, I have nothing to gain by lying about it. I call it like I see it for any game I review on any system.
