Kasz216 said:
Squilliam said:
Kasz216 said:
Squilliam said:
Or you could say people made an incorrect assumption?
|
Not at all. If the intent isn't what was meant and most people got it wrong, the fault lies in the writing.
If that is what he would of meant. There would of been a good way to phrase it, rather then to say 100K per developer per year.
|
Thats not always the case, Hitler said exactly what he intended to do in his book. So the fault in that case was in the reading.
"100k per developer per year." Thats pretty much straight forward if you read it exactly as is said. 100k per developer... Since this is a games sales site, a degree of industry knowledge is expected from readers and if they aren't up with the play then they probably shouldn't be posting in a thread about game budgets now should they?
|
I once again think your clearly off base here. 100K per developer per year is very straightfoward in that it is 100K for a developer for a year.
The Hitler point i'm not quite sure what your saying.
He said nothing about budgets or calculations.
Simple 100k for a developer for a year.
|
What he said was extremely straight forward as well. "You realize that 100K/employee/year is the standard, right"
Thats phrase pretty much explains itself, if you find it confusing you shouldn't be posting in this thread its a very simple concept and if anyone didn't understand it they don't have the credentials required to post here.
