Gnizmo said:
|
ssj12 said:
So pretty much its similar to the PS3 versus 360 now. PS3 has a stronger processor but weaker GPU. Thats exactly what I thought but thanks for backing up what I thought. I do know that the GSX, PS2's GPU, follows a very interesting design that doesnt act like a normal GPU does making it stronger than some GPUs of that time.
Still wasnt it also the same way with the Dreamcast? Stronger processor weaker GPU, thought it was how it was.
Also where is the Saturn in this? Stronger than the SNES or weaker, this I forget.
And why? I have a pretty damn good understand of technology, just not older console hardware past minor things I have read. I do understand the GC, Wii, PS3, and 360 pretty damn well.
|
You have your generations off by one for the Sega systems. Saturn was more powerful than the SNES, and PS1 as I recall. The Dreamcast has a weaker GPU, and lower RAM. The CPU clock speed is slightly lower, but it is a 128-bit processor. The PS3 and 360 are much much closer in terms of tech specs.
|
Genesis vs NES
Saturn vs SNES & PS1
Dreamcast vs N64 & PS2 & Xbox
I'm correct. As Saturn was released in 1995 if I remember correctly. Genesis was like what... 4 - 5 years before it. Dreamcast was like 1998?
