I think the "1/5 is too low" camp probably has it right.
If you ask yourself "Does Rygar Wii deserve a 2.0/10 or a 4.0/10?", lets face it, Rygar isn't an unplayably terrible game -- it deserves a 4.0/10 just by nature of decent design, even if it is old. The reviewer is (rightfully so) upset about the port being... well practically meaningless, but honestly, it deserves a higher score than 2.0/10, which is usually reserved for the bottom of the junk heap.
If you've never played the game and only own a Wii, its possibly worth a purchase -- heck the Action Adventure genre has practically no serious competition on the Wii, outside of the recent Tomb Raider game, and the Prince of Persia ports (both of which were quite a bit better than a non-upgraded PS2 Rygar, IMO).
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
