Seems likely after all. If CPU and GPU are on the same dice, AMD could make a very cheap offer compared to both on their own dice (and even more when AMD manufactures both, no joint venture with anyone).
The contract sounds like one that Nintendo would make, although this doesn't mean others wouldn't make similar contracts. In any case, all three are likely making R&D with their future manufacturing partners.
And, the processor isn't necessarily CISC processor.
| Tuulikk said: Is the evolution of PowerPC CPUs so dead (not counting Cell) that it ain't a good alternative no more? I have been wondering if the low clock frequency on Wii CPU is because of it going to hot on a higher? If so, maybe a switch to AMD is good for Nintendo after all. |
Bolded: That's what tend to happen when increasing the speed. Just look at 360, it's CPU is essentially 3 Wii CPU:s clocked at 3,2 GHz and produces a lot more heat or PS3 CPU, runs at 3,2GHz and produces even more heat (although it has better cooling).
PPC has just as much room to improve as x86 or any other RISC/CISC processor.
Ei Kiinasti.
Eikä Japanisti.
Vaan pannaan jalalla koreasti.
Nintendo games sell only on Nintendo system.







