EA Posts Fiscal Q3 Net Loss of $641 million

[Groucho]

NJ5 said:

Groucho said:

Wait, sorry... you lost me here.  How again are the Wii games cheaper to develop and make if the developer has to spend more on them to succeed?

EA's new Wii attention, by the way, is focused on the casual market -- i.e. where the Wii succeeds, and has proven itself.

Is this gonna be like the other times when someone posts several links from publishers and developers saying Wii development is cheaper, and then you end up leaving the thread and saying the same thing in another one a few days later?

As for your last paragraph, here you go:

http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=59273&page=1

 

Wii Development is cheaper.  Also, weak/new development teams are cheaper.  I was stating that fact, responding to someone who insisted that if only publishers would spend more, they would get results.  Do you guys not understand the irony in what you're suggesting?

Also... Dead Space (your link)... isn't that um... a port?