By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
gebx said:
dbot said:
@dodece - Sometimes less is more.  You don't need a thousand words to convey a simple thought.  I disagree with your post.  Gebx did some fairly straightfoward trolling by trying to downplay a PS3 exclusive and elevate Halo Wars as the gold standard of console RTS.  This was obvious to everyone but you.  We have made our points and we are moving on. 


The only difference I see between your post and Dodece is that he's saying PS3 fanboys are downplaying Under Siege and your saying I'm downplaying it.. actually your saying I'm trolling. But I've read my thread mutliple times and I can't see any lines or phrases saying anything negative about Under Siege.. so I'm a little confused on the new meaning of "trolling"...

There are many differences between my post and dodece's post.  I could care less about Under Siege, in fact until a day ago I had no knowledge of its existence.  My problem with your original post is you are framing Halo Wars as the new standard that all console based RTS will strive to match.  Let's wait for the game to release before we decide if it will be the true RTS measurement.  I think you began trolling with your arguments regarding the PS3 not being a suitable platform for an exclusive RTS and your belief that Sony money-hatted a developer in a lame attempt to develop a Halo Wars killer.  Perhaps it is unfair of me to accuse you of trolling, since I do think you were just having some fun in your original post.  I appreciate your sarcasm.

 

 



Thanks for the input, Jeff.