dbot on 26 January 2009
| mrstickball said: So we have to assume that if something comes out earlier on the 360 then that means that MS *must* have paid Capcom off, or forced them to release it later on another network? What if the 360's architecture is easier to develop for, and easier to build a demo on? What if Sony is lazy about getting demos onto their network? There are so many variables, it seems fanboyish to only accuse MS when it's against your console of choice. |
Microsoft has a history of paying for exclusive content. I doubt that MS would have released the exclusive demo PR announcement, and the exclusive RE5 bundle PR anouncement without some kind of agreement with Capcom. I don't think it is a bad thing for MS to do, but you shouldn't be suprised when someone points it out.
Thanks for the input, Jeff.
