Seraphic_Sixaxis said:
Agreed its silly lol. And @Benga- Just my opinion on the subject. i dont ever see the wii getting close to the HD consoles in the graphics area, not by a longshot, not even early games like Halo 3 or Folklore. Just sayin in terms of beauty Fragile = Best in Graphics for the wii atm. Overall with games like that one "King" game, its obvious most devs could careless about the wiis graphics and more about its innovation. The one true game thats exclusive to the wii that could take the throne as Number one imo is MH3 in terms of graphics.
|
Don't make up things.
No one said Wii would come close to the HD consoles. And you said (quote) Fragile = Wii's maximum IMO which is just silly.
Devs only recently have started to realize that in order to maximize profits they have to take the Wii seriously, and every other week there's an article about how surprising it is that core games actually sell and that core Wii gamers expect great graphics as well. Not the HD quality graphics, but relative to the power of the system. That's why people like efforts like Fragile, Monster Hunter, MadWorld and the Conduit. Not that they can stand up to Killzone, but because the quality of the graphics are great FOR WII, which means the developer put effort in the game (which will likely mean a good game).
Graphics like the afforementioned games are just the beginning. Again, not saying these will ever come close to a Killzone, but I'm sure we'll see awesome looking stuff on Wii.
I can only imagine what a real Wii Zelda will look like, since Twilight Princess looked great imo and was a GC game.
