| kabhold said: 360 Pros Quality of PS3 multiplats (Many say that the 360's look better/play better)
|
I appreciate your effort since most people have just sided with 1 system or other. Couple things: all PS3s are backwards compatible with PS1 games, some multiplats run better on PS3, and not many games require mandatory installs. That said, I'm obviously biased since I own a PS3 and don't own a 360, so I've already made the decision.
For all those comparing $200 to $400 for the price of systems: that's a joke, and you know it. There are far too many features you can't use without a HD. If a person isn't going to play online (and pay for live) or download any demos, games, rock band songs, or anything else, then sure, it's $200. It's a better deal than the Wii, though, because that doesn't have a HD, either, but the 360 lets you do a lot more with the system so it's a waste not to have a HD.
I will say that Sony needs to lower the price of the PS3, even if it's worth it to me to get Blu-ray, a built in HD, wireless, and great stability (which some of you say MS fixed on 360, but it was never a problem on PS3).







