damndl0ser said:
Being corporate responsible is the only way to run a company. Sure they could keep everyone they laid off and even hire more people they don't need but eventually they would end up like Sony. Losing billions, and being close to bankruptsy. I would be much happier taking my chances with a company who lays people off when it is needed, as oposed to a company who never lays anyone off, and the entire company go under.
|
That's because you're thinking only with 2 options, firing or company doom, but if the corp has in the board billionaires that appear everytime in the Forbes list (and one of them is not only the wealthiest man in the world, but a philantropist also), there's more options than that without compromising the company... And i'm not talking with my ass, i've seen this in major companies like the one where i am now, the shareholders did a "crazy" plan but if they had taken the traditional route, my division had to lay off people, and we'll had to plan a restructure...
Of course, some of this options are insulting to the extreme neo-liberalists, but i prefer billionaires that know when to lose some personal millions in favor of saving their company without losing a lot of personal...







