| demacII said: Actually. madskillz most people don't research games to that depth, nor should they. By not including a DLC content for one system is obvious signs of "financial agreement" of some sort and that is just plain immoral and shows lack of respect for gamers. I knew about the DLC issue and made sure that when I played the game no support would go to the studio. |
A financial agreement is immoral? You do realize that using your logic, every single game is immoral since it was the product of a "financial agreement." How dare Sony not bring Uncharted to the Xbox 360! Curse them and their financial agreements! How dare my boss hire me and not my less qualified competition? Curse the financial agreement we made to exchange a service for money!
Get over it, this is business. And let me tell you this, no public company has your best interest in mind. Sure, they may not want to treat you like douches, but every decision they make is to please stock holders, get good PR, avoid bad PR. Even if Bethesda offered the content free to everyone, it would be to build up their reputation so you'll buy their game in the future. There is nothing wrong with liking a product a company makes or certain people in a company, but liking a company? You do realize their business is taking your money away, regardless of how great a product they make.
Good news Everyone!
I've invented a device which makes you read this in your head, in my voice!
