@jammy2211
The point of the post wasn't to use reffered numbers but rather an example of what is understood and the logic behind it. You can disagree with it or not, but the point is that as long as M&S has sold and equal ammount of units as MGS4 that MGS4 will not over lap it in profit, but at the same time M&S will not over lap MGS4 in revenue. That's all.
There's nothing to debate here, I'm not speaking facts I'm explaining a generalization. As with all generalizations though they don't apply to every case. Also your assuming I'm not factoring marketing, shipping, production, R&D and all the other niceties but I am, the quantities I used are just figments of my imagination, I could very well have said: "MGS4 would need 7 units sold to break even thus..." But for familiarity I used numbers that could be close to the actual numbers and if they are, then it still wouldn't augment in anyway my point.
Now you want to say that M&S is a 1st party title, I had a nice talk with another guy who thought the same thing, almost a year ago; I'll say this, before Mario and Sonic could be published Sega had to license the IP's of Nintendo and for that alone this game is a 3rd party title.
Unless you want to say Sega didn't request Nintendo license the use of them - in which case either your misinformed or your lying. All Nintendo did was supervise, the game was designed by Sega Sports and Sega Japan. In Japan and Japan alone was this game published by Nintendo, you seem to not want to mention this.
I'm Unamerica and you can too.
The Official Huge Monster Hunter Thread:
