By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
PS360N64PSXBOX said:
Enix, Majesco, Eidos, Capcom, Rockstar, Sega? Nope. I know GTA is on 360, but Sony lost that title years ago. Eidos as far as I know is just delaying it's stuff and Sega sucks so big loss. Capcom? You mean RE5? Resident Evil was never a PS2 only title, RE4 was on the GC first and why should Enix bother me? FF had a game on the GC and DS, so that wasn't a PS only title either. You may be overexaggerating what the PS3 has lost, as some of these were never sony sole titles to begin with or due to their CEO's slow actions in keeping them. The PS3 is fine right now, no worries on my part. And why would it cost so much? It's not like they have to spend 30 mill, just that some do.
You are correct many is overreaction what PS3 have lost, but the main problem is that we (or at least I) doesn't here about more exclusivs for the PS3. So far more 3rd party games seems to be heading for the Wii exclusive than for PS3, which seems to get more and more ports from xbox360. That might be bad for playstation in the long run.

Now sega gave PS3 VF5, is that a bad game? If not why do you state that sucks? Wii got the best Sonic this gen so far, the gets Nights exclusive. But most important is that more games is actuly more important than quality. Sounds boring doesn't it but it is true.



 

 

Buy it and pray to the gods of Sigs: Naznatips!