By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
noname2200 on 18 January 2009
Edit Thread
Strategyking92 said:

very well. But before I begin, i will say I did not include the DS because it isn't complete Sh*t and I happen to find it has a nice library (phoenix wright, advance wars), I didn't even mention it BTW. Also, about your subjective statement, the same could be said to you, when you mention the following games and have not even played them (especially the japanese ones)

 

 

1. obscure japanese game which has nintendo characters in it (I feel this is only going to stay the same as I name down the list.. a bit dependant, no?) but I'll give you this one. +1

2. the vgchartz sales data came up as the #1 result on google..  So, you should read the comments for info

3-4. not nintendo published... I'm talkin' bout nintendo, not tecmo. Technically they were published by nintendo in a territory though... +2 to you.

5. shitty port cash-in of a gamecube game that was never published.

6. ............... it's chess..... why did you list a 500 year old game? it's like saying microsoft published a slight remake of minesweeper. wow, key exclusive.

7. I've heard it's pretty good +1

8. Wii music..... sure, that's something to be proud of.. anyway +1

9. I actually wanted to get this game, but they said it was too short  +1

10. unique. Not something people could get lost in    +1

11. uses old IP, and is a demo.

12. wii play... Ok, I have that game and it's the disabled half cousin of wii sports +1 anyway 'cause of rules

13. *sigh* good at parties +1

14.  Alot of 'wii' titles that aren't full game experiences. but because of my conditions, you get it. +1

15. Uses Mario.. and sonic, two old IP characters.

 

 

Well, 10. Pretty close for you. Seriously though, if that's all you got, that's pretty sad for trying to prove a point, expecially if like 4 contain the name "wii".

 

I'm pleased to see that you didn't disappoint! Actually, you did a bit (I was looking forward to "Wii ___ games are all the same series!", but you can't win 'em all). I liked the part about the DS (it counts because I like it!); it goes exactly with what I thought you would say. The part about a game not counting as a new IP because I didn't play it was a bit...odd...though.

Anyhow, glad to see that even after your edits I've met your completely meaningless, wholly arbitrary, and thoroughly subjective criteria. Am I to take it, then, that you will retract your original statement, and return to the old (but admittedly completely valid) "I don't like the Wii because it doesn't appeal to me" standard?