| MontanaHatchet said: I find it funny that Stickball will use Vgchartz numbers when it suits his point, but throws them out the window when it suits another. I don't mean to be a dick, but the hypocrisy is crazy. |
Could you explain to me when I am, or am not using VGC numbers to prove a point?
I've always used external numbers, such as Famitsu, MC or NPD first since they aggregate for a living. But when that said number isn't available, I use VGC. If you'd like to show me where I'm not doing that, feel free to.
@Torillian, then I guess I'm wrong about the 1.3m shipped, and I apologize. I thought that it was shipped, but if 1.3m is indeed played, then I guess I can't debate that, can I? Either way, that doesn't change the fact that VGC was tragically off on MKvsDCU, and may be off on LBP in the process - unless VGC wants to increase the MKvsDCU numbers for the 360 by a high amount, too. I guess that could be a plausible argument too - that MKvsDCU just happened to be undertracked alltogether.
Back from the dead, I'm afraid.
