Heh. I wrote that review to pander to no specific bias. Which is why it reads closer to a report on scientific findings with hypotheses on why things happened the way they did than it does a self-indulgent rant on why the game rocks or sucks. Much like how scientific reports are more useful to more people (in the long run, anyway) than sensationalist news stories are, so too did I intend the review to be more useful to as many people as possible than to a specific group of people.
Sky Render - Sanity is for the weak.








