HappySqurriel on 16 January 2009
| BTFeather55 said: They didn't fail. They just pointed out the very real flaws of the game like 29 (also including Game Informer and Eurogamer) other publications did. Of course, they forgot that the Wiistians will be there in droves to pick up any Nintendo game no matter how flawed and especially if it has accurately low review scores. If they had wanted to succeed in keeping this game's sales low they either would have ignored it or given it a fairly high score see the terrific (not) sales for Metroid Prime 3. |
Now, there are very few games which legitimately have 50% of their review scores above 70% (with 25% above 80%) and also have a lot of scores in the 30%, 40% and 50% range ... Now, when you have reviewers bragging about how they are going to trash a game before they have played it the reason why there is such a discrepancy becomes clear.
