By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
c0rd said:
outlawauron said:
Well, I disagree quite a lot ItsaMii.

First of all, Symphonia isn't very good. Mediocre even.

Abyss is the true evolution of Symphonia, and was a better game in all aspects.

I think you are really blinded by nostalgia, because it was the only big RPG on the Gamecube. (much like Quest 64 on N64)

But of course, it's just my opinion.

Eh, do people care about this? It's not as if he didn't have a PS2 with access to other RPG's (including Abyss). Hell, I didn't have a PS1 so Quest 64 was the only RPG I played in that era, which was awful, by the way. ToS is something else.

There's just no need to devalue his opinion like that. The argument would only hold if he were a Nintendo/GC fanboy (caring which system a game is played on?). Besides, I always thought most people preferred Symphonia over Abyss - shown in both reviews and popularity. These aren't all Nintendo fanboys.


OT: Too bad. I received this game as a gift, though it's with my bro atm. If I can get this $133 360 arcade deal to come through, I'll be playing it in a week or so. It'll be my third Tales - can't wait.

Well then that's quite different. Being that he didn't have a GC, I'm not sure how people like it as much as they do. Although, I thought most thought that Abyss was much better than Symphonia since it improved on it in every way.



"We'll toss the dice however they fall,
And snuggle the girls be they short or tall,
Then follow young Mat whenever he calls,
To dance with Jak o' the Shadows."

Check out MyAnimeList and my Game Collection. Owner of the 5 millionth post.