noname2200 said:
A serious question for you, Outcast: Do you actually want to learn what's going on, or are you just hellbent on making a fool of yourself? If it's the latter (and I suspect it is) then carry on, as you clearly don't need any help. But in the unlikely event that it's the former, and in the even more unlikely event that you can stomach reading several hours of work by someone whose viewpoint is antithetical to your own, then go read here and here, and start using your critical thinking skills. Note that you'll have to parse through some Nintendo cheerleading, and that not everything the man says is gospel, but it will point out for you why exactly you're completely wrong. And if you have any questions, direct them to SkyRender, RolStoppable, or one of several other members who have their heads screwed on straight. But this method you're employing does nothing for you. Again though, I doubt learning is what you're after.
|
Hello, noname2200. I have no idea who you are, but it seems you know me so I'll attempt to reply to your post in a way that would satisfy you.
I have nothing to learn from this Malstrom. I imagine he has a few things to learn from me, however; I'd point him in the direction of a dictionary for a start. Maelstrom.
Perhaps you think that a nobody who starts a blog on the internet holds more sway and influence over Nintendo's strategy than a high ranking employee from the company. Perhaps you think I'm wrong about taking the quote from the Nintendo employee, that they aren't competing with Sony and Microsoft, and daring to believe that that's what he actually meant. Perhaps you think some of the comments in this thread, that he meant something completely different to what he said are more valid than just quoting what he said. Perhaps you are the one that needs to do some thinking?
Who knows.
