By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Final-Fan said:
Smashchu said:
Dolla Dolla said:
leo-j said:
And that saying its a $600.00 system vs a $350.00 system or $280.00 system or a $450.00 system etc..

Actually $500. The uptake of 80gb Motorstorm bundles is decidely less than the $500 60gb.

Surprising. You'd think with the Playstation name and two consoles with 100 million a piece under their belts they would sell quite a bit differently. Yet, the PS3 is tracking only a bit higher than the Gamecube and nearly on the same track as the original Xbox.

http://vgchartz.com/hwcomps.php?cons1=PS3®1=All&cons2=GC®2=All&cons3=XB®3=All&align=1

Times have certainly changed.


That's what you get with a 600$ price tag. if it weren't for the other two systems, the system would be dead now at less then a million sold.

What? Are you trying to say that PS3 sales would be worse if the Wii and 360 didn't exist, or if the GC and Xbox didn't exist? I ask purely out of curiosity because either way that statement is insane.

I think he's trying to say that if the PS3 had been Sony's first system, the $600 price tag would have killed it almost instantly. The main reason the PS3 hasn't died is because of brand recognition.