By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Khuutra said:
KBG29 said:
Graphics are a package. Killzone 2 has better graphics than Crysis. Picture for picture Killzone 2 gets owned by Crysis, but in motion Killzone easly surpasses Crysis. Animation, Physics, partical effects, textures, polygons ect. are all part of graphics. To try and seperate them and say one game wins because it is better at this part is a stupid argument.

So to sum it up, Killzone 2 = Crysis, but I would rather play Killzone, and look at pics of Crysis.

This is about as good an argument in favor of Killzone 2 that we're ever going to see.

Any takers?

 

Yes, Graphics also means the creativity of the actual environment. Displaying brown and gray does not mean good graphics, no matter how good the brown and gray look. Even in that Area Crysis is better than Killzone 2, both lose to a lot of other games in that respect however, but at least you see a whole tropical island worth of beauty in Crysis. That said Crysis still comes out on top. As I've stated, I've been staring at grays and browns for over a decade, no thank you. And crysis still wins in sheer power, that is, physics, polygons, textures, etc.



Tag(thx fkusumot) - "Yet again I completely fail to see your point..."

HD vs Wii, PC vs HD: http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=93374

Why Regenerating Health is a crap game mechanic: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3986420

gamrReview's broken review scores: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4170835