richardhutnik said:
I thought it was a single book vs a single game. I can say, YES a single game can provide greater replay value than a single book. Consider a GAME like chess. People play this for years, and keep returning to the same game. Again, I am talking GAME here, not interactive fiction that often gets labelled "games". GTA4 single player is interactive fiction. GTA4 multiplayer is a game. On this, I am not about to go on this crusade of trying to correct people regarding the proper usage of terms, and get people to start saying "interactive fiction" instead of games. Ok, want to know bang for the buck value, and longevity, it would be this: 1. Real game. 2. Book. 3. Interactive fiction.
|
God I hate it when people are too full of themselves for their own good. I would be willing to bet you fit into at least one of the following:
- You scoff when someone orders a steak
- You scoff again when they don't finish it
- You leave or at least think about leaving notes on peoples Hummers to tell them to stop killing the environment
- You love telling people that independent movies are the only movies that are worth anything. It doesn't matter if they're terrible, they're saying something!
- You own a mac
I mean really, a GAME blah blah blah blah. Just get over yourself. A game is a game is a game is a game.








