MikeB on 07 January 2009
@ Fumanchu
I don't think the question of whether the game "sold badly" was in contention? You were presenting your argument against it's 'amazing' review scores and perceived quality, which shouldn't be in contention either.
Well, we're probably going to read review of an "improved" PC version eventually, maybe perspectives changed.
Halo 1 scored 97% on the XBox and later the "improved" PC version scored only 83% (metacritic).
Halo 2 scored 95% on the XBox and later the "improved" PC version only scored 72% on average.
IMO an outstanding game at its core should stay relatively timeless and not dip so deeply in people's minds later on. I still hold Super Mario World and Mario64 in high regards.
