misterd said:
psrock said:
Soriku said:
psrock said:
Nice way of jumping on Legend guys. Let me repeat what he tried to say.
Why would third party spend more money to create bigger games when they don't have to in order to make a profit?
|
lawl, are you back in 2007 too?
I think we've heard that same argument way too many times to count...yet devs seem to not care.
1. Lowest cost
2. Highest userbase
There you go. Reason enough. Or should the PS2/DS also gotten only shovelware...because they sold them well too? I mean...no point when they sell those well right?
Yet devs pretty much say "**** you" to people who say that.
|
the fact that you guys feels the wii deserve the big games is funny. This is business and thanks to the market, the wii has shown us that small budget games can do pretty well on it.
The wii will sell as much or more than the Ps2, but its no PS2, AND NEVER will. The ps2 got all the big games, all of them.
|
Like Halo and Smash Bros?
|
If the Wii was the PS2 in terms of software support there wouldn't even be threads like this one. I know some people like to argue about anything but come on some of the things people are arguing against in this thread are ridiculous. People arguing that Wii Sports isn't a huge system seller or that the Wii and PS2 share the same level of support from third parties need to stop trying to argue everytime they hear something they don't like.
