NYANKS said:
You judge which company is "smarter" based on the economic philosophy they use? Look, last time I checked Nintendo was dominated for ten, count 'em TEN years while this is Sony's first taste of getting pwned. Why couldn't such a smart company (Nintendo apparently) recover faster than that? Different business policies does not equal greater "intelligence". On the PSP, anyone who thought the PSP would just waltz in and steal a monopoly that Nintendo has owned for years overnight is ludicrous. If Sony ever said that, well, their PR is famous for a reason. Their PS2 BS didn't do half bad for them last time I checked. I'm not counting the next PSP out whenever it comes out. The first handheld to ever put a dent in Ninty. About 1/3 of the market actually. They should definitely not drop the Playstation brand. That would be a knee jerk reaction at its finest. Ninty didn't need a fresh start with the DS, their 100% monopoly was not in any danger at the time. Sony definitely needs to rethink things, like their price. Let's see if Sony gets beat like they stole something for ten years before we go crazy. |
yes they were getting "owned" but exactly how many years did they post a loss, I think MAYBE 1 in the GC years... The Gamecube actually made Nintendo money.
So now, who is smarter. Sony has more years of posting a loss with the PS3 than Nintendo has... like ever. (reffering to gaming divisions)
Basically Numbers aren't everything, if nintendo would have spend 10s of million more on the GC launched it at 99 dollars and paid for AAA exclusives they would have sold alot more cubes. But it would have been a Pyrrhic (sp?) victory.
End of 2009 Predictions (Set, January 1st 2009)
Wii- 72 million 3rd Year Peak, better slate of releases
360- 37 million Should trend down slightly after 3rd year peak
PS3- 29 million Sales should pick up next year, 3rd year peak and price cut







