Hamas legalizes Crucifixion

[Final-Fan]

Avinash_Tyagi said:

Not at all, i'm approaching it from the viewpoint of a skeptic, and yet I am willing to accept evidence, but evidence has not been shown. It is Credible if it is supported. Also I am not stating that he deos not exist, you are trying to state it as fact that he did exist, when it is clear it is not fact, but rather just a theory. I have maintained a position of skepticism, but have not said that he deons not exist, only that his existence is uncertain. You are the one who has tried to argue as though you are certain and yet without proof.

Yeah the mind may have reamined intact, but unlikely in addition, you haven't addressed why he waited 60 years to write the gospel, if it was so important to him, and why the shifts in the language of the gospel indicating different writers

Maybe he was busy with spreading the good word more personally, or he thought someone else would do the biography, or he was illiterate and didn't spare the time to sit down with a scribe until he was decrepit.  And maybe that scribe decided to do some editing, or maybe it got edited later on (but the original text did exist and obviously then Jesus is attested in it).  I'm not saying that these are facts, in fact I'm just making them up; I just wanted to point out that those reasons didn't seem compelling. 

Maybe I am wrong about your opinion, but you hold to such a fringe viewpoint, rejecting so much evidence, that it seems to go beyond mere skepticism IMO.