dolemit3 said:
321tttrini4everz said:
johnsobas said:
gavind5uk said: ps2 still selling after 9 years and you say ps3 wont hit 50m after just 2 year at its highest price? cobblers |
Sorry but the PS3 is not the PS2, not even close. PS3 better compares with the gamecube then the PS2 (though both are unfair), gamecube didn't even really have a 5th year it was already dead. For the record the PS3 is still tracking behind the gamecube in Japan and almost tied (appears to be fractions behind) with the gamecube in america.
|
you are jocking right ? i mean....the gamucube was available for $99 in 2003(i believe its second year)
the PS3 $400.....alot of consoles was released with a $500(and higher) price tag and never did good in terms of sales..they never got to 10million(in my knowledge).......PS3 @ 18million right now.....it says alot
|
Well, how many of those that launched with a $500 price tag had a 140 million+ selling predecesor?
|
FIXED
ummm..good point though....PS3 is bound to hit 100million due to the high selling predecessors(ps2 and ps1) plus a price cut LOL
just like me...a ps1 and ps2 owner, i don't own a PS3 360 or a wii.....the only console that interests me is the PS3...well it is really a matter of time b4 i get the PS3