Hamas legalizes Crucifixion

[Final-Fan]

Avinash_Tyagi said:

Final-Fan said:
I'm going to sleep now. Avinash_Tyagi, I leave you with this reiteration of an earlier point that may have gotten lost in the shuffle:

What exactly is your alternate theory here? How did his existence get manufactured in such a brief time? Why didn't anyone say anything like "wait a second that never happened, there was no such Jesus"?

To say simply that we aren't OMG 100% ABSOLUTELY sure of the "Jesus was real" view isn't good enough. There has to be a "Jesus wasn't real" view that at least makes some sense. What is it?

I already answered that question, one prevailing theory is that Jesus is actually an Amalgamation story, drawn from Mithras, Horus, Prometheus and other saviors

First off, it's not a "prevailing" anything.  Your skepticism is very much a fringe belief even among secular historians. 

Now, fine, the amalgamation theory.  But (1) how did the amalgamation form so quickly?  I mean, wouldn't it be awfully suspicious to fabricate the existence of someone who was supposedly around within living memory?  Why did no one deny this claim?  (2) How could such a blatant falsehood get into the writings of some of the best Roman historians of the day only a few decades later? 

Christianity was viciously opposed by Jews as heresy.  There were many attacks on an intellectual level as well as physical.  (3) Why the hell would there be absolutely no evidence that they didn't completely miss this golden opportunity to discredit the religion? 

(4) Looking at the amalgamation itself, that's quite a list.  Mithras was from a Roman religion of apparently Persian/Zoroastrian descent; Horus is Egyptian; Prometheus, Greek.  Mithras in particular is interesting, because it didn't become popular until the 3rd and 4th centuries and isn't even known to have existed prior to Jesus' lifetime.  Very interesting that Christianity could be "drawn" from a religion that seems to be contemporary with it at best.