| ph4nt said: Sonic 3D castlevania Halo DMC Need for Speed. Gameplay mechanics that need to die Random battles: the only reason they were implemented in the first palce was because there wasn't enough power to display the monsters on screen, turn based is fine, just get rid of random battles. lives: this was a gimmick in the arcades to get people to put in extra quarters, we don't need them anymore. they are usually just a set back that makes you restart the game where you left off, unnecessary. |
Map-based battles have been around since at least the original Legend of Zelda, if not even sooner: even the NES was apparently powerful enough to display the monsters onscreen. Random battles are just a different style, for people who can handle a little unexpected combat. They are not an older or obsolete style, and retain the same place in gaming that they've always had.
If lives were a gimmick to get people to put in more quarters, why did they result in longer play per quarter: exactly the opposite of what you allege was their purpose? Again, they're just a different style, for people who can handle meaningful consequences for their mistakes. Again, they are not an older or obsolete style, and retain the same place in gaming that they've always had.
Complexity is not depth. Machismo is not maturity. Obsession is not dedication. Tedium is not challenge. Support gaming: support the Wii.
Be the ultimate ninja! Play Billy Vs. SNAKEMAN today! Poisson Village welcomes new players.
There is much to hate about modern gaming. That is why I support the Wii.







