*facepalm*
Most analysts do not care to really study the market and arrive to stupid conclusions due to their laziness to really analyze the market values Nintendo Wii offeres to the consumer. The Wii will over and over again prove them wrong as the system advances in the path of disruption.
why do analyst not take into account that the Wii is the console that consumes less power of all three? I mean come on, in the long run is a money saver and cheaper than all other consoles. In times of recession, saving money is an important factor.
Game library is not Nintendo's fault, and very good games are comming in 2009 and all you have to do is a little research that these Analyst do not do.
(I will post about the gaming genres and the consoles later on)
there is no denial that Nintendo's online service is different from Live and PSN. But most customers do not get online and less willing to pay for an online service they will not use frequently. Live is the online gaming heaven for hardcore players, but it's not the number one appeal in the expanded market.
Nintendo is well aware that they must keep the momentum going and they do not rest in that matter.
........
I see so many things wrong in the article, it's more a wishful thinking than a real analysis. And it's even more incredible that they are getting paid for their stupidity
oh well....
