DMeisterJ said:
xlost7 said:
@DMeisterJ
I know what I'm excited about. I like the whole aspect of the game, the whole monster hunting and doing little side missions. But you have to clearly say this game is flawed without having online support. You should know this..And your right about stating if Wii owners are so hyped up about this game they should just get the PSP or PS2 incarnations. But what if they are happy about the announcement alone, what if the Wii-controls are better suited for them, what if they don't have a PS2 or PSP.
This Wii version will certainly fill their void. And who said the game would be $50. And its a direct port from the PS2 incarnation.
Resident Evil 4: Wii Edition released probably for $50 or $40 if I can recall and a month later went down to $20.
I'm not going against or anything but this game or MH-Tri alone should have Wii owners wanting this. And you should thank them for this, cause the more users or fans grab this the more we will see more releases of Monster Hunter, hopefully they don't milk the franchise. |
The Wii version actually doesn't control all too awesome if you read the previews. Especially because it doesn't use WM+, it's just (sorry) a "waggle-fest". At least that's how it was described in a preview I read. That's why they added Classic Controller support, and it'd probably control better traditionally anyway. It wouldn't gain too much by using gestures and such.
So it's not about controls.
Pricing isn't it either, MHF and MHF2 are old, and can be found for 30 bucks or so.
You didn't like MHF or MH, you're not going to like MH3. Plain and simple.
|
First it is about controls that was my gripe. If there was a lock on feature it would certainly help. And a link to the Wii controls not being to well would certainly help out my decision.
I did like the original Monster Hunter on the PS2, why because it had online support.
Multi-player is the key to this game...
